The Soviet Circus: The People’s Entertainment
Under the Roman Empire, two things were critical to keeping the people happy: panem et circenses. Bread and Circuses. If they were fed and entertained, they were pacified. Centuries later, the Soviet Union took this philosophy to heart. Bread had always been a sore point – it was a protest about bread shortages that had catalysed the October Revolution and brought the Communist party into power. But the circus was something the Soviets did well. The circus was the peoples’ entertainment, and it came to symbolise something more than just a fun family day out.
From Entertainment to State Instrument
The nationalisation of circuses in 1919 transformed them from mere entertainment into powerful tools of the Soviet state. The Moscow Circus, in particular, became a symbol of national identity and strength. Unlike the ballet, Russia's other great cultural export, the circus was the art form of the proletariat – accessible and affordable.
The Soviet regime understood the circus's inherent accessibility and potential for messaging. Through thrilling audiences with feats of acrobatics and animal artistry, the Moscow Circus subtly weaved elements of Communist ideology into its performances. The famed 'Cranes' act, a flying trapeze troupe inspired by a song honouring fallen soldiers, added patriotic fervour into the spectacle. This unique blend of spectacle and propaganda ensured the reach of Soviet ideals extended far and wide, influencing vast, diverse audiences.
The ideological message wasn't just figurative. Alongside animal acts, clowning, and acrobatics, the Soviet circus included a strong narrative element – something revived by modern acts like Cirque du Soleil. Dance numbers told folk stories and legends, often with an overtly nationalist message. Citizens received a thorough grounding in socialism, with clowns satirising the Party's enemies. This focus on narrative and artistry set the Soviet Circus apart, prompting Western circus schools to emulate their techniques and methods.
Forging Performers: The Moscow Circus School
To ensure the circus served its ideological purpose, a dedicated institution was created. The cornerstone of this system was the Moscow Circus Artistic School, founded in 1927. This centralised institution was the sole training ground for circus artists across the USSR. Admission was fiercely competitive, with thousands vying for just 70 spots each year. The rigorous curriculum combined intensive physical training with ideological indoctrination in the teachings of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin – ensuring graduates were both skilled performers and loyal servants of the state.
This dedication showed in the performances. Performers, especially acrobats, received formal ballet training, adding grace and artistry to their displays of strength and agility. Artists performed nine shows each week, delighting over 70 million citizens per year. Since these well-attended, state-run shows often lasted for hours, they became outlets for Soviet propaganda.
Life as a Soviet circus performer offered perks rarely found elsewhere. Retirement benefits, childcare, maternity leave, and the opportunity for foreign travel were highly desirable. Performers received better housing – a privilege normally reserved for the political elite. The famous clown, Oleg Popov, was even awarded the title of "People's Artist of the USSR". This made a circus career not only appealing but a mark of prestige, highlighting the state's control and influence over this unique form of entertainment.
Architecture of Spectacle: The Brutalist Soviet Circus
Circus traditions in the USSR had strong roots, with families of artists owning and operating their own circus buildings. Once the circus was nationalised in 1919, circus buildings were passed to the state administration. A 1952 Council of Ministers decree mandating the creation of permanent winter circuses across the USSR, saw a boom in circus construction.
From the late 1960s, over 50 circuses were constructed by the end of the 1980s. In the absence of precedents, architects and engineers devised innovative solutions, even on-site in some instances. These buildings, with their round shapes echoing Soviet "cosmic architecture". While the exact layout varied, Soviet circuses adhered to general design parameters to accommodate the distinctive needs of circus performances.
Unlike theatres with their one-sided stages, circuses fully utilise both horizontal and vertical space. Additionally, circular, multi-level foyers surrounded the amphitheatre for technical and security purposes. The ambitious scale of these structures, coupled with costly equipment and sometimes subpar construction quality, made them expensive to maintain. The collapse of the Soviet Union, and the decentralisation of the management of these buildings and making their upkeep even more difficult.
Coded Critique: The Polish CYRK Poster
But by the 1960s, with the Soviet stranglehold over culture showing signs of weakness, the traditional image of the circus needed a facelift. The state turned to poster artists to come up with a more modern aesthetic that showed the USSR was keeping up with the times.
The most famous posters to come out of this period were created by the artists of the Polish Poster School. Poland, by then, was governed by a Soviet-supported Communist regime. Though largely autonomous, they were still subject to heavy censorship – especially when it came to the arts. So the brief from the ZPR (the state agency that oversaw the circus) was surprisingly ambiguous. The posters needed to excite the public about the circus that was coming to town. But they wanted art, not advertisements. The posters shouldn’t contain literal depictions of any of the acts.
The resulting CYRK posters are notorious. Characterised by bright colours, striking typography and aesthetic playfulness, they were hugely influential in the later development of graphic design. And because governmental oversight was relatively loose, a lot of them also got away with taking discreet swipes at the Soviet regime. Magicians and clowns masquerading as spies appear frequently, suggesting the double dealing and misinformation of the Communist regime. Tightropes and tumbling acrobats suggest its imminent demise.
One of the more obvious motifs is the bear. Bears in CYRK posters are often seen riding bikes or balancing on balls – references to common animal acts of the time. But bears are also representative of Russia, having been used as symbolic shorthand in plays and cartoons for time immemorial. Read as such, bears in CYRK posters take on a different meaning: one critical or even mocking of the USSR’s attempts at world domination. CYRK posters may have been intended to promote a nationalist pursuit, but their subtext reveals a much more critical position.
The Soviet Circus, once a symbol of Soviet power and ideology, experienced its pinnacle of popularity in the 1980s, just as the USSR itself began to crumble. While the state-controlled circus persisted after the Soviet collapse, both its physical structures and ideological influence faced decay. CYRK posters, with their subversive undertones, reveal the cracks in the facade long before the system's demise.